Matossian Estate v. Clark Estate Confirmed on Appeal

We are pleased to note that the British Columbia Court of Appeal has now affirmed the decision in Matossian Estate v. Clark Estate 2024 BCSC 2214. The decision confirms the soundness of the trial judgment.

Appellate review serves an essential function in our legal system. The Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold the trial ruling reflects its agreement with both the legal framework applied and the careful assessment of a complex and highly fact-specific record.

Background

The case arose following the death of Sharon Clark in December 2020. Sharon died intestate, without children. Under British Columbia’s Wills, Estates and Succession Act (WESA), her estate would pass either to her spouse, if she had one. Otherwise it would pass to her next of kin.

The dispute centred on whether Dikran (“Dick”) Matossian, Sharon’s partner of nearly 38 years, qualified as her spouse for the purposes of WESA. Although Sharon and Dick never married, maintained separate residences, and largely kept separate finances, they shared a long-term, exclusive, and deeply integrated relationship.

Sharon’s brother challenged the characterization of that relationship as “marriage-like.” Dick’s estate sought a declaration that he was Sharon’s spouse under WESA.

Trial and Appellate Decisions

The trial lasted several weeks and included extensive evidence from friends, family members, and community witnesses. The Supreme Court of British Columbia concluded that Sharon and Dick met the definition of spouses under WESA.

The Court applied settled law governing marriage-like relationships and emphasized that modern relationships must be evaluated holistically based on how the parties actually lived their lives.

The trial judge also considered how Sharon and Dick spent most of their days together, shared routines, and vacationed for extended periods. Over decades, they supported each other in every way, and friends and family consistently recognized them as a committed couple, demonstrating the depth and longevity of their relationship.

When brought before the Court of Appeal, the matter was dismissed. The appellate decision underscores the deference owed to trial judges who engage in a thorough, principled analysis of complex relationship evidence, and it reinforces the reliability of the legal approach taken at trial.

Legal Implications of the Decision

Matossian Estate v. Clark Estate is significant for the clarity and depth with which it addresses key issues in modern estates law:

  • Separate residences do not preclude spousal status, where the evidence shows an integrated and enduring partnership.
  • Financial independence is not inconsistent with a marriage-like relationship, particularly in long-term relationships between mature, self-sufficient adults.
  • Objective, third-party evidence, from those who observed the relationship over time, can be decisive.
  • The courts continue to apply WESA in a manner that reflects contemporary relationship realities, rather than rigid or formalistic models.

The affirmation on appeal strengthens the decision’s value as a reference point for future cases involving long-term, non-traditional relationships and intestate succession.

With the Court of Appeal’s confirmation, Matossian Estate v. Clark Estate brings clarity to the law governing marriage-like relationships under WESA. We are grateful for the thoughtful consideration of the issues by both levels of court and for the opportunity to assist in the development of this area of law.

See also our firms work on Jones v. Davidson 2022 BCCA 31.

Go to top